![]() |
Smoking Teeth = Poison Gas
Uploaded by: davidkennedydds
Video Description:
The dramatic video titled Smoking Teeth = Poison Gas has had a tremendous impact on both the public and professional audiences.The full version plays 40 minutes with interviews of experts in the fields of mercury toxicology, environmental medicine, politics and dentistry. It is available from the IAOMT for $14.95 + $4 shipping. Send Kym an email at info@iaomt.org to order your personal DVD today.
Tags for this video: amalgam controversy dental dentistry fillings mercury poisoning smoking
Find more videos in the "Howto" category
See more videos uploaded by davidkennedydds
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
















You are correct in stating that the visible smoke is mercury. If as your blog indicates you are still a doubting Thomas I suggest that you review the 2 videos posted above. I trust that will eliminate any doubts you may still harbor. Please do not hesitate to ask again.
All these dentist care about is their BMW Coopers and cushy suburban lives.
I told my PCP about the excess saliva and he consented to order a serum analysis which I know is useless. It came back normal.
I tried the Chlorella Cilantro ticture protocol after reading about Dr. Klinghardt. I was faithful to it and stuck with it for 4 months. It got too expensive.
I think I am ok it's just embarrassing. I told my dentist about it the day after removal 1-06 and also contacted IAOMT and they said it would get worse before it gets better.
I explained my concerns about the danger of remaining mercury and the bacterial issue with Root Canals to my oral surgeon and consented to him my permission to extract them and he said it was unethical.
This quack Dr. Trichtinger, not my holistic dr., said #16 was a composite which was a lie. He said it would be unethical to remove crowns because of some obsession I have with mercury.
If you had a dead toe and wanted a doctor to remove it wouldn't that be the ethical thing to do?
What if they insisted on putting on new skin as it had turned greenish, making a fake toenail because the other had fallen off, screwing it on with titanium and charging you thousands of dollars?
Replace dead toe with dead tooth and you have dentistry's standard of care. Problem is the SOC. it is your choice not the dentists.
Today it takes 8 years and costs about $400K to $600,000 to get an undergraduate and dental degree. Another $400K to buy a practice so the new dentist is $1M in debt.
Overhead is 80% so to make the $16,000 monthly payments they have to do $80,000 before they earn a dime. It is hard dangerous work intricate and long hours and low pay.
In Tolhurst vs the ADA the ADA successfully argued that they owe no duty of care to the public.
They accepted no responsibility whatsoever and said it was the responsibility of the FDA to determine if fillings were safe or effective.
The FDA has never classified encapsulated dental amalgam.
Don't be angry, get even by telling everyone else what pissed you off.
It isn't that the dentist did this or that. That makes you a victim. Rather that ignorance reigns supreme in this land.
Watch the Christopher Bryson in Fluoride Deception to see why it is so simple to fool some of the people all of the time. Better yet read his book by the same title.
Now that you understand, help me get the word out. That's what I am doing.
An amalgam patient is a patient for life...
The reason I said that if fingers had noses Dr. Eichamn would be in real danger is simply because of the dangers of inhaled mercury is far greater than the absorption of mercury from skin. Not that any amount of mercury is good but more is worse.
Personally I wouldn't want the source of mercury anywhere near myself but some feel that a brief exposure is tolerable. Less is best in my opinion.
How far is your nose from your teeth?