![]() |
Beyond Belief '06 - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Uploaded by: baneoffafnir
Video Description:
Sunday, November 5th - Neil deGrasse Tyson gives examples of the apparent un-intelligent design of the cosmos.
***CORRECTION - the date in the titles is correct. the day is not. this took place on sunday.***
www.beyondbelief2006.org
therareoften.blogspot.com
Tags for this video: 2006 Atheism Belief Beyond Dawkins deGrasse Design Harris Intelligent Neil Religion Richard Sam Science Tyson
Find more videos in the "Howto" category
See more videos uploaded by baneoffafnir
| Beyond Belief '06 - Neil deGrasse Tyson | Stupid Design | Dawkins vs. Tyson |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Slacker Astronomy: Neil deGrasse Tyson | Mike Tyson | Neil deGrasse Tyson |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
















The reason people have to choose to or not to believe in God is because the human condition makes us aware of a higher power. Whether you are theist or atheist, you grasp, and cannot avoid the concept of God. It's the nature of humanity.
-DisasCatas
Mainly because I don't believe he existed. Well, not as the Son of God.
-DisasCatas
The God-concept and manufacturing of idols pre-dates even the oldest structures. It is the nature of mankind to perceive of God.
Since there is evil in this world, and since there is weight between good and evil, we must have free will.
That's my argument, anyway.
However, I used the word 'God' in my comment to mean the Western, mainly Judeo-Christian concept of God - a personal overlord governing all the affairs of the cosmos. This of course, is obviously not universal. Your very example is a case in point.
I hold it that pantheism and transcendentalism, the tendency to be awed by nature and mystery, is more universal.
I will not intertube fight with your ranting.
Hey everybody, go watch my AMVs, give me a low score maybe God will keep them 5-star anyway.
(Hint: He won't)
To many preachers have used their God concept to manipulate others. It is quite dangerous.
My argument is that we all share the same perception. And that there is a purpose and reason and a validity for that perception.
Also I don't have anything better to do than respond to you on youtube.
As the great pantheist Einstein has said,
"The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity."
Of course we know Einstein was pertaining to Buddhism.
But I have to disagree. Einstein's mythical figure in anything outside physics is only a recent development. At the height of Einstein's fame in the 1910's, many Christians hated Einstein for his bold statement of his belief in a non-personal God (or his non-belief in a personal God, if you'd like it that way); many people disagreed with Einstein's theological belief. That was before he was Christianized.
And who else can you quote on pantheism except Einstein & Spinoza?