![]() |
Pro Life is Anti-Woman - George Carlin
Uploaded by: TurpisHaereticum
Video Description:
This material belongs to HBO and is used here under fair use law. Thoughts on Abortion.....How did chickens get involved in this? Because they are decent people.
Tags for this video: abortion bible bush Carlin choice christian comedy george hbo jesus life pro religion turpishaeretcum wade women
Find more videos in the "Comedy" category
See more videos uploaded by TurpisHaereticum
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
















immoral priests, sperm of executed guys, life began a million years ago and its just a continual process...(yes, but) does this mean its fine to kill ur 2 year old child who gets injured and will be disabled the rest of his life??? etc.
-can an argument not be taken seriously unless its proponents set themselves alight? did pro choicers ever set themselves alight?
- killing doctors is wrong too,..does this mean every belief they have is wrong?
- my question is, where does one draw the line? i take it nobody would think its reasonable to kill a 3/4 year old baby, based on severe physical disability...when does it become unacceptable?
I really wish I was Pro-choice. can someone please convince me?
same goes for wanting them for military.
care should be there all the time, but just because its not, shouldnt ursurp the ethics of the issue.
Nobody here will try to persuade you abortion is moral. They will only assert choice. Reason: everybody knows some choices are bad, that choice isn't moral in and of itself. The same is true of allowing free choice--not moral in and of itself. It is the content of choice, and what choices are allowed, that makes it moral or immoral. Nobody here can, or will attmept, to convince you that directly butchering a baby is a moral choice to make.
mttu(dot)com(forward slash)abort-pics
but how can prochoice people look at anti-abortionists and say they are insane and evil? sure killing doctors is evil - NO DOUBT but not every anti abortionist should be painted with that brush
However, life begins at birth. We are born and then we live. We don't celebrate "conceptiondays", we celebrate birthdays. A woman has the right to choose whether or not to abort her pregnancy. There aren't any "baby rights", because it's not a baby yet. It's a fetus. You have an egg, that becomes a fetus and then is born to become a baby. End of story.
Further, your linguistic argument is circular: there are no baby's rights because it's not a baby yet. You have said nothing. This is a debate about legal recognition of personhood, not about what days we do or don't celebrate as a matter of custom and how the medical community speaks about the life in the womb.