NewYorkGiantsFans - Giants News Line

(2006) Ron Paul: GOLD AND THE US DOLLAR [Part 1]



Uploaded by: jaralero
Video Description:
( April 25th, 2006) Rep. Ron Paul speaks before the US House of Representatives.
(2006) Ron Paul: GOLD AND THE US DOLLAR [Part 1]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GcP_Lw4BCc
(2006) Ron Paul: GOLD AND THE US DOLLAR [Part 2]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHsh_SwAstw
(2006) Ron Paul: GOLD AND THE US DOLLAR [Part 3]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C04kIwnzRSg
(2006) Ron Paul: GOLD AND THE US DOLLAR [Part 4]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEm03U7eXTw
---------------------------------------------------------------
(Transcript)
Madam Speaker, the financial press and even the network news shows have begun reporting the price of gold regularly.
For 20 years, between 1980 and 2000, the price of gold was rarely mentioned. There was little interest, and the price was either falling or remaining steady. Since 2001, however, interest in gold has soared along with its price.
With the price now over $600 an ounce, a lot more people are becoming interested in gold as an investment and an economic indicator. Much can be learned by understanding what the rising dollar price of gold means.
The rise in gold prices, from $250 per ounce in 2001 to over $600 today has drawn investors and speculators into precious metals markets. Though many already have made handsome profits, buying gold, per se, should not be touted as a good investment. After all, gold earns no interest, and its quality never changes. It is static and does not grow as sound investments should.
It is more accurate to say that one might invest in a gold or silver mining company, where management, labor costs, and the nature of new discoveries all play a vital role in determining the quality of the investment and the profits made.
Buying gold and holding it is somewhat analogous to converting one's saving into $100 bills and hiding them under the mattress, yet not exactly the same. Both gold and dollars are considered money, and holding money does not qualify as an investment. There is a big difference between the two, however, since by holding paper money, one loses purchasing power. The purchasing power of commodity money, that is gold, however, goes up if the government devalues the circulating paper currency.
Holding gold is protection or insurance against government's proclivity to debase the currency. The purchasing power of gold goes up not because it is a so-called good investment. It goes up in value only because the paper currency goes down in value. In our current situation, that means the dollar.
One of the characteristics of commodity money, one that originated naturally in the marketplace, is that it must serve as a store of value. Gold and silver meet the test; paper does not. Because of this profound difference, the incentive and wisdom of holding emergency funds in the form of gold becomes attractive when the official currency is being devalued. It is more attractive than trying to save wealth in the form of a fiat currency, even when earning some nominal interest.
The lack of earned interest on gold is not a problem once people realize the purchasing power of their currency is declining faster than the interest rates they might earn. The purchasing power of gold can rise even faster than increases in the cost of living.
The point is that most who buy gold do so to protect against the depreciating currency, rather than as an investment in the classical sense. Americans understand this less than citizens of other countries. Some nations have suffered from severe monetary inflation that literally led to the destruction of their national currency.
Though our inflation, that is the depreciation of the U.S. dollar, has been insidious, average Americans are unaware of how this occurs. For instance, [Page: H1730]
few Americans know nor seem concerned that the 1913 pre-Federal Reserve dollar is now worth only 4 cents. Officially, our central bankers and our politicians express no fear that the course on which we are set is fraught with great danger to our economy and to our political system.
The belief that money created out of thin air can work economic miracles if only properly managed is pervasive in the District of Columbia. In many ways, we should not be surprised about this trust in such an unsound system. For at least four generations our government-run universities have systematically preached a monetary doctrine justifying the so-called wisdom of paper money over the foolishness of sound money.
Not only that, paper money has worked surprisingly well in the past 35 years, the years the world has accepted pure paper money as currency. Alan Greenspan bragged that central bankers in these decades have gained the knowledge necessary to make paper money respond as if it were gold.
(...)
[ http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531 &id=7442935 ]


Tags for this video: 2008 constitution dollar elections fiat gold liberty money paper paul ron usa

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by jaralero

Related Videos
Ron Paul on Alex Jones Show: Bailout deal equals dictatorship (pt.2)To: America From: Ron Paul Re: Bailout, Rescue Plan, etc...Ron Paul, Nashua: 48 Hours Before 2008 NH Primary With WWE's " KANE " Glen Jacobs Part 1
ron-paul-on-alex-jones-show-bailout-deal-equals-dictatorship-pt2.htmlron-paul-on-alex-jones-show-bailout-deal-equals-dictatorship-pt2.htmlron-paul-on-alex-jones-show-bailout-deal-equals-dictatorship-pt2.html
Message to Ron Paul Supporters from AnonymousPaulJim Rogers: Federal Reserve, Gold, Oil, Commodities! Bob Barr 08!Restore LIBERTY PART 2
ron-paul-on-alex-jones-show-bailout-deal-equals-dictatorship-pt2.htmlron-paul-on-alex-jones-show-bailout-deal-equals-dictatorship-pt2.htmlron-paul-on-alex-jones-show-bailout-deal-equals-dictatorship-pt2.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
Here's some inform, ... ( 5 months ago by superjump01)
Here's some inform, In the two plus decades Ron Paul has been in office he hasn't authored a single bill that's made it through congress. The man's greatest claim to fame is being elected time after time for doing nothing. I don't care where his politics stand, his record of ineffectiveness disqualifies him from the presidency
His voting records ... ( 5 months ago by hrihiratu)
His voting records consistency is unmatched. His has sponsored a lot of good bills. If only the congress is not hijacked by the warmongers.
You're right. We ... ( 5 months ago by randont)
You're right. We should vote for Mccain, B. Hussein Obama or Hilary. When they author bills to raise taxes it is passed. Or when they author bills to take away our liberties or increase government spending they are also passed. Vote for Mccain, Barac or Hilary vote for more taxes more spending and more government control! They actually acomplish something even though that accomplishment is screwing over the american public.
Wake up man.. none ... ( 5 months ago by kuza01)
Wake up man.. none of his bills get support bc he is one of the last honest politicians left in Washington. All clowns left in washington are for bigger government and bigger corporations. EXACLTY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT RON PAUL WANTS.
Also do your research..Who received the most money from active duty troops than all of the GOP candidates COMBINED? I'll give you a clue its NOT John McCain
I did do that ... ( 5 months ago by superjump01)
I did do that research and most of those troops were actualy OFF duty Army RESERVISTS. And your assinine hatred towards "big corporations" is ignorant in and of itself. Big corporations make big money witch in turn make big revenue which in turn STIMULATES the economy. They also employ thousands upon thousands of people who would otherwise be jobless and then homeless. the economy of America is BUILT on "Big corporation" Please try to think more before all of your braincells atrophy.
So your telling me ... ( 5 months ago by kuza01)
So your telling me were supposed to support this failing economic policy while at the same time letting the Oil companies, wall street, and the Military industrial complex reap all the benefits? We failed to listen to the farewell speach of Eisenhower. There are more billionaires than ever before while at the same time the middle class is on the ropes. If you look at poor countries most of them do not even have a middle class.
"If you look at ... ( 5 months ago by superjump01)
"If you look at poor countries most of them do not even have a middle class" Thats because the whole damn country is a damn middle class or lower. "the Military industrial complex" It was World War II that brought us out of the great depression. "There are more billionaires than ever before while at the same time the middle class is on the ropes." so how is that the Billionaires fault that poor peopel are poor. All it takes is a decent education to get a good job and thats all anybody needs.
"So your telling me ... ( 5 months ago by superjump01)
"So your telling me were supposed to support this failing economic policy" The economy is so bad because nobody has any money to spend on boosting the economy. People were to busy either buying things they didn't need, or things they could never afford but wanted anyway, with credit. When your stuck paying debts that YOU hot yourself into you have only yourself to blame. People always co,plain about the national debt, when the debt of Americas citzens themselves is well over 5 or 6 times that.
I like to think I ... ( 4 months ago by galetski)
I like to think I know political gold when I see it, and Ron Paul is it. Go, Ron, Go!
The timeline of the ... ( 3 months ago by michaelandolga)
The timeline of the infinesis is independent of the stochiochastic results therein. That's were the contradiction lies! If the epistemological foundations regress towards the monetary mean, all will be lost. Fathers, brothers, sons and their kin will reconcile the wildebeast's haunting raillery. Who would have thought in 2008 that Adrakan's Mean would have so deciphered the congery?!
Hahaha, WONDERFUL. ... ( 3 months ago by jaralero)
Hahaha, WONDERFUL. Contradiction does not lie in either sense, Omnia sol temperat, purus et subtilis. Contradiction is the sun of April and the God of means, it is useful to some, harmful to others, and unreasonable to all. You know wild beasts sing and pray,
"If a congery of states be a nation, let eels rule on earth"
Which is why Ron Paul has deciphered Inflation, so the whole crew may say: "Foul Play!"
i'm a libertarian/ ... ( 2 months ago by shakaama)
i'm a libertarian/democrat... why do i like this guy. he should defect to the demo party, so we can give him the respect he deserves.
are you kidding ... ( 2 months ago by shakaama)
are you kidding about the corporations? corporations are selfish. the business method is to keep costs down, i.e. labor, expenses, overhead, taxes. wholesale shipment of labor overseas as well as overhead means there's no reinvestment into our economy DEFACTO. so they make their money AND KEEP IT. hoarding is the way to go with corporations, there's no trickle down. if left to their own devices corps would simply leech off the economy.
Oh for the love of. ... ( 2 months ago by AcomsRazor1776)
Oh for the love of... EVERYTHING that comes from overseas must first go through customs. Imported goods are taxed when they come into the country. That generates tax revenue. Then the product must be sold. this builds the company capital and also generates more tax revenu. Tax revenu from consumable goods is probably the largest source of revenu that their is especially when products are sold in MASSIVE amounts. Simply the importing shiping and selling of goods stimulates the economy dipshit.
Secondly Big ... ( 2 months ago by AcomsRazor1776)
Secondly Big corporations employ MILLIONS of people who buy things which generates tax revenu, also they pay income tax which ALSO generates even more revenu. Look at most African countries. Big corporations won't go in there because of their oppressive taxs, not just for buisness but for workers as well. This Makes it IMPOSSIBLE for people to build capital because there are no big corporation jobs, which kills their economy. NO big corporations = DEAD economy. Look at any 3rd world nation.
first of all, under ... ( 2 months ago by shakaama)
first of all, under several legislations, corps are given subsidies to ship jobs overseas. Next, most levies, excise taxes and duties have all but been repealed in the interest of free trade, this includes goods manufactured overseas by companies housed in america. get your facts straight.
"all but been ... ( 2 months ago by AcomsRazor1776)
"all but been repealed" Which means they haven't been repealed, which means that imported goods are STILL taxed! Don't try to use complicated word/sentence structure to make things seem like less then they are. If Big corporations didn't worry about their bottom line they could very easily go bankrupt which would ONLY hurt ANY Economy. Over 70% of taxes payed in this country are paid by less than 10% of it's peopele. Who are these 10%? Rich buisness owners. Now how exactly is that fair?
source? ( 2 months ago by shakaama)
source?
Look up the six ... ( 2 months ago by AcomsRazor1776)
Look up the six american tax brackets. The rich pay out upt to nearly 40% of their income will people who make 30,000 pay only 15%. The top three tax brackets account for more gained revenue overall than the bottom 3 brackets. But if Obama gets his way americans who make more than 30 thousand will be considered upper calss and be required to pay 25%
dude i'm not ... ( 2 months ago by shakaama)
dude i'm not talking written law, i'm talking reality.
you can't back up your comments with the tax code, you show me revenue tax sheets. you can't, and you have no clue what you're talking about. and it's public knowledge for public figures to show their taxes. there's a bone go find it. bet you you'll be surprised to see you're wrong.
Are you saying that ... ( 2 months ago by AcomsRazor1776)
Are you saying that Hundreds of thousands of wealthy buisness owners and partners are "cheating" on their taxes. That the MOST watched people by the IRS and the Fed in the whole nation are just Saying no to the IRS and not paying up. It would be easier for me to get away with murder! But being a Ron Paul supporter Arent you suppose to be an advocate of NO income or property tax? That Whould count for the Rich also wouldn't it. SO big buisness owners should be Ron pauls BIGGEST supporters.
they don't have to ... ( 2 months ago by shakaama)
they don't have to cheat. i know one of the owners of amway... no sorry i know one of the businessmen in amway. he's slated to pay 1 million in taxes per year, BUT HE DOESN'T. why? because he prepares for taxes year round and come time to pay he pays a fraction of what he SHOULD be paying.
is he unique? no. is he smarter than the average billionaire? no. in fact i went to several of his speaches where he was teaching us how to avoid taxes by always itemizing everythin.
following his ... ( 2 months ago by shakaama)
following his example, for 3 years i was in the business, on paper i was in the red. I claimed everything on my taxes. to the point that i got tax refunds yearly. and it was all legal and verified. i saved every single receipt and logged all my trips in my car, noting the odomter. this is all easy stuff.
John McCain AKA ... ( 1 week ago by TruDru1978)
John McCain AKA McClueless, or McLame is more McSame of Bush than Obama. I'am like you somewhat skeptical of DEM, and the GOP that's why unlike most Black-Americans I have no Party Ties--I'am Independent which is what the Latinos, and Jews are; why do you think the Parties try to cater to them?



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code 


._._._._._._._._
We effectively market using TrafficBigDog - Effective Internet Marketing Services