Search Tags:

Paid Advertisement
SingleFling.com
Chat with real local sexy singles ready to meet!
EasyTVonPC.com
TV on your computer FREE! Instant Download!
NewYorkGiantsFans - Giants News Line

Joe Rogan talks about DMT



Uploaded by: TxJake
Video Description:
Joe Rogan recounting his experience with DMT and his ideas on humanity.
In no way do I condone the the use or production of DMT in any way.
This is for educational purposes only.
Not that I think you could do anything with the information givin but hey...
*******************************************
Since there has been ALOT of email comming in asking for more information related to DMT I would like to refer any individual seeking more info on this amazing chemical to www.erowid.com. And remember to be careful with what you do with this information. DON'T DO ANYTHING STUPID/ILLEGAL!


Tags for this video: dmt Joe life Rogan txjake

Find more videos in the "Comedy" category
See more videos uploaded by TxJake

Related Videos
DMTJoe Rogan VS. FeministJoe Rogan vs. Myspace challenger
dmt.htmldmt.htmldmt.html
Joe Rogan UFOJoe Rogan, DMT, Life.Shpongle DMT
dmt.htmldmt.htmldmt.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
we might just be ... ( 3 days ago by kvlahovic)
we might just be bacteria...
i need to get me ... ( 3 days ago by BarChar227)
i need to get me some of dat shiiii
yep, that's why I ... ( 2 days ago by LordEmilous)
yep, that's why I really want to try it!
we are, were a ... ( 2 days ago by perksy10001)
we are, were a virus with shoes "to quote bill hicks"
our purpose in life ... ( 2 days ago by knarkdjur1)
our purpose in life is to destroy earth. thats what its all about
slutmonkey: ... ( 2 days ago by harlon57)
slutmonkey: Spirituality is a state of mind. Alternate states of mind are still states of mind. The mind is nothing more than your brain.
While we may be interesting machines to carry genes, that is what we remain.
The mind vs. brain ... ( 2 days ago by alpsalish)
The mind vs. brain issue has not been resolved nor do these terms describe the same thing, even if one were dependent on the other. Actually, science isn't really equipped to deal with issues of spirituality. Any scientist will tell you this. Another point to be made, we aren't interesting machines to carry genes. That's like saying that certain traits willingly survive when in fact traits merely remain (natural selection). We aren't purposeful "machines" anymore than we are purposeless blobs.
We work is all. ( 2 days ago by alpsalish)
We work is all.
alpsalish: I beg to ... ( 2 days ago by harlon57)
alpsalish: I beg to differ. Over the past 100 years, doctors and scientists have been able to determine many if not most functions of the brain due to strokes which disable certain parts of the brain, and brain scans, which show us what is working and when.
Richard Dawkins, ... ( 2 days ago by harlon57)
Richard Dawkins, evolutionary biologist also disagrees with you that science cannot study spirituality. People make claims that can be studied.
Same for Stephen Pinker.
You need to brush up on your reading.
alpsalish: Any ... ( 2 days ago by harlon57)
alpsalish: Any purpose we may have is self-derived.
We evolved from lower beings, and you add purpose to your life, the universe does not do it for you.
So, you are only ... ( 1 day ago by alpsalish)
So, you are only making reference to strokes and our knowledge of the brain in that context? That's not very broad. You would have to give me much more. It is a common fallacy of people from every period to think we are closer and closer to ultimate answers about the nature of why things work the way they do. The more questions we answer, the more new questions develop. We can't say one way or another how close we ultimately are to understanding the nature of the universe and everything in it.
You cite Dawkins, ... ( 1 day ago by alpsalish)
You cite Dawkins, but a website as basic as wiki says, "Dawkins discusses what he sees as the dangers of abandoning critical thought and rationale based upon scientific evidence. He specifically cites astrology, spiritualism..." So, obviously a critic of spirituality. I'm gonna go out on a limb here, but the only thing he insinuates is that spirituality is quite void of rationale and scientific thought. Science cannot validate or invalidate spiritual belief. That is fundamentally impossible.
Agreed... We are ... ( 1 day ago by alpsalish)
Agreed... We are creatures of meaning.
Alpsalish: you make ... ( 1 day ago by harlon57)
Alpsalish: you make broad generalizations without saying anything.
You have cited no facts, no sources.
You do nothing but provide mere conjecture.
We now know that god doesn't cause earthquakes, they're caused by plate tectonics. God doesn't cause hurricanes or plagues and the earth isn't the center of the universe and the sun doesn't orbit the earth.
Science has provided evidence of evolution and that germs and genetic faults cause disease.
Your vague comments add nothing to the discussion
Instead of going ... ( 1 day ago by harlon57)
Instead of going out on a limb and guessing, how about picking up some of his books.
Start with "The Selfish Gene". There are many more by Dawkins and others that provide the facts that you don't seem to be aware of.
Read Stephen Pinker, "How the Mind Works" for a glimpse into what we knew ten years ago that you don't know now.
You say science cannot validate or invalidate spiritual belief. You cannot even prove that statement. You have no way of knowing what science will learn in the future.
That's a cop out ... ( 1 day ago by alpsalish)
That's a cop out and you know it - broad generalizations that is. You give me one example about how we understand strokes and expect me to assume we have great insight into the brain in general. Shame on you. As far as the citation argument is concerned you don't do any better - seriously. You "cite" Dawkins in passing, but make no mention of an idea. Lame as well. Simple premise here. Belief is not testable through science. That is fact. Read up on falsifiability.
One last thing, I ... ( 1 day ago by alpsalish)
One last thing, I am an advocate of science and I don't dispute that which is testable through observation and experiment. Belief is inherently untestable. Spirituality includes belief. Let's say this. Belief for the most part is not testable. Certain components of spirituality may be. There can not be a blanket rule however.
I've always felt ... ( 1 day ago by studentRT)
I've always felt like our lives are meaningless and that one day we, like dinosaurs, will no longer rule to earth.
Now, sorry to end everyones trip but the bills still gotta get paid and life goes on.
Drugs are useful ... ( 1 day ago by killphana)
Drugs are useful but not necessary for exploring altered (higher) states of consciousness. Transcendental meditation is better.
To know anything ... ( 1 day ago by killphana)
To know anything about awareness seems to demand an impossible reflexive act like trying to see your own eye. "How can the knower be known?" The answer is by exploring states of consciousness by means of psychedelics, meditation, etc. Don't fall victim to British empiricism.
Better? Who are ... ( 23 hours ago by skyrimian)
Better? Who are you? God?
Better in that it's ... ( 13 hours ago by killphana)
Better in that it's a natural process that will improve your overall health. Better in that nothing needs to be smoked, ingested, etc. Better in that it doesn't cost you a thing. DMT is not for the weak minded. Unfortunately it is usually the weak minded who are interested in drugs like this and use them recreationally with no respect for the drug. Broaden your horizon and direct your negativity elsewhere. Also, what does your wrathful patriarch in the sky have to do with my preferences?
I understand what ... ( 11 hours ago by killphana)
I understand what you're saying but keep in mind I did not mean to say it was best. Everyday judgment requires that one recognizes difference in quality or effectiveness, i.e. better or worse. Also, I appreciate the diplomatic response.



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code 


._._._._._._._._
We effectively market using TrafficBigDog - Effective Internet Marketing Services