Search Tags:

Paid Advertisement
SingleFling.com
Chat with real local sexy singles ready to meet!
EasyTVonPC.com
TV on your computer FREE! Instant Download!
NewYorkGiantsFans - Giants News Line

We Think



Uploaded by: CharlesLeadbeater
Video Description:
A new book by Charles Leadbeater, 'We Think' explores the potential of the latest developments of the internet


Tags for this video: 2.0 books Charles Leadbeater Profile Think We Web

Find more videos in the "Education" category
See more videos uploaded by CharlesLeadbeater

Related Videos
Re: We ThinkAndrew Keen optimistic about Web 3.0"The Global Alliance" Team Achievement (web 2.0 marketers)
re-we-think.htmlre-we-think.htmlre-we-think.html
NES Freedom - Upgrade Your Membership Today[NES FREEDOM] YOUR MINDSET DETERMINES YOUR SUCCESSHome Based Business Success | Introduction by Elizabeth Richardson
re-we-think.htmlre-we-think.htmlre-we-think.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
Sounds wonderful ... ( 2 months ago by svirsk)
Sounds wonderful again, I alone have to save capitalism, and guess what I have to do it for free.. Whoops just created value for YouTube (and Google) and ah also an extra hit and comment for Charles. Mass innovation = mass exploitation. Will commenting pay my bills, will sharing information bring me food on the table, will recognition save me from starvation? Knowledge economy, intellectual labour, affective labour.. Wake up!
But communities are ... ( 2 months ago by svirsk)
But communities are many times privately owned (like this youtube community) I do get the recognition, but they get my intellectual property, and they get some extra content to display adds next too. What would you suggest, should all communities be open source, or should everyone try to start a community and try to own other peoples thoughts?
The peer to peer ... ( 2 months ago by CharlesLeadbeater)
The peer to peer sharing of knowledge reeks of scientific community more than communism. Science too mainly works via recognition as the main source of immediate reward.Mass sharing of knowledge often avoids the very risks you warn about by reducing reliance on single untrustworthy sources.
Sadly, scientists ... ( 2 months ago by andrewbreen)
Sadly, scientists turn down the reward of recognition in favor of ill obtain grant money. In a pure world recognition reigns, but as we both know - need I finish?
The average person doesn't know what they are talking about and are sure to drown out the intelligent input by sheer volume, that and they will rarely recognize a valid point made by a truly reasonable individual. Its no wonder mist brilliant minds avoid politics and government.
Although I agree ... ( 2 months ago by andrewbreen)
Although I agree that some lesser knowledgeable individual's false perception of the way things work (and subsequent blog about it) may trigger a new line of thought in the tired old mind of the expert that has been stumped by stagnation in the ideas department...but who gets the recognition and how does that put dinner on the table?
In the Linux ... ( 1 month ago by drone4four)
In the Linux community, developers get merit according to merit, like the quality of their work and contributions to their respective projects. Their work sometimes lands them well paying jobs at big IT companies, but sometimes not. For most Linux developers they work a real life job and in their spare time on open source software. Your right, andrewbreen, sharing of ideas doesn't put food on the table, but that's OK with me. I like the current order with the internet and Linux being hobbies
I agree with your ... ( 1 month ago by thegooman7)
I agree with your idea. As already stated in this thread, a principle issue with the online sharing of ideas is the "online" part--people need to become more accustomed to defining their lives outside of the internet realm. This pertains to people who define themselves according to their myspace pages and to ideas that remain just that because people didn't go beyond the net to go out and make something of those ideas.
The internet is a wonderful means, but it is just that: a means, not an end.
Which is a precise ... ( 1 month ago by thegooman7)
Which is a precise danger behind the free propagation of ideas. But it's all about how the people to whom the ideas are presented take them. The advent of the internet has better facilitated the transmission of ideas, but the effects of an idea (and the dangers behind the possibilities) remain the same.
the linux income ... ( 1 month ago by Joeey)
the linux income model is that competent people are supposed to be paid for operating and customizing the software, however the ownership of the software is free. This is a lot better model than the current Microsoft with sh-- software and most MS "licensed" network engineers are a joke. Linux kicks serious ass and MS are a bunch of crooks living the good life.
yes i agree, thank ... ( 1 month ago by miriame2008)
yes i agree, thank you fo the reply
Blind Faith by Ben ... ( 1 month ago by ajmessinis)
Blind Faith by Ben Elton... A good read..
lol, is Wikipedia ... ( 1 month ago by GavinRoskamp)
lol, is Wikipedia crap? :P
Thanks for putting Linux in there. The Linux community appreciates it!
Very well put ... ( 1 month ago by snowtoadman)
Very well put andrewbreen. I find a whole lot of people think personal opinion trumps scientific conclusions and with enough personal opinion scientific evidence becomes irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
we are big on ... ( 1 month ago by MizLiberty)
we are big on social media and positive potential of web 2.0. FOund Ben's book to be a good wake up call
This seems like a ... ( 1 month ago by hotpinkslink)
This seems like a bad copy of the "web is us/ing us" video.
in the past you ... ( 1 month ago by ineedoxygen222)
in the past you were what you owned, now you are what you share
nice one
Array ( 4 weeks ago by RuneMo2)
Amazingly done.
My opinion: we don't really have to make a shitload of money to live. I mean as long as people share ideas it's useless to have a shitload of money because it would be unnecessary. You can build your own life using your brain. But the most important thing is the afterlife, if you do good in this life and you believe in god and mohammed, you're on the right path. use the best of this life in a good way to make yourself happy in the next life.
Nice! BTW, if we ... ( 2 weeks ago by mailw1n)
Nice! BTW, if we take care of the earth and share her fruits equaly we don't need money and/or ownership. We are (creating and sharing, loving and living), so WE ARE.
Nobody has become poor by giving - Anne Frank
i'd like to add ... ( 2 weeks ago by misslowlaaa)
i'd like to add regarding the spread of information and ideas
in the past life is enriched by what we know
today life is enriched by who we know
therefore, networking become an important thing to support it, youtube community as an evidence
nice video btw ^^
I think is much ... ( 2 weeks ago by d2m333)
I think is much better to be recognized and to share with other people because is really easy because money is good but that people learn something with my works is much better, we'll have a better world with better and not superficial human beings.
Question? In which program did you make this video?
Awsome! thanks!
i dont know what to ... ( 2 weeks ago by Emilymarkin)
i dont know what to think of this but that just made me tired watching it
Communist. ( 1 week ago by Stradlverius)
Communist.
and so are you ( 1 week ago by cheeseflips)
and so are you
ebolish money we ... ( 4 days ago by guidomith)
ebolish money we are alll equal



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code 


._._._._._._._._
We effectively market using TrafficBigDog - Effective Internet Marketing Services