![]() |
Psychology professor discusses 'growth' versus 'fixed' minds
Uploaded by: sbstocker
Video Description:
In a conversation with Stanford Report writer Lisa Trei, psychologist Carol Dweck says people's self-theories about intelligence have a profound influence on their motivation to learn. Those who hold a "fixed" theory are mainly concerned with how smart they are—they prefer tasks they can already do well and avoid ones on which they may make mistakes and not look smart. In contrast, she says, people who believe in a "growth" theory of intelligence want to challenge themselves to increase their abilities, even if they fail at first.
Tags for this video: Carol Dweck intelligence mind psychology
Find more videos in the "Howto" category
See more videos uploaded by sbstocker
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:

















These are just beliefs based upon what hasn't been done yet. Just cause it hasn't doesn't mean it won't. I'm going to guess that it can be done just that no body has pursued it that far. Eg, they have pursued increase in intelligence from 95 to 110 but not decided to pursue a further increase.
Secondly your argument is flawed because you assume it is going to take a lifetime to achieve that level? Who is to say it is going to? My original argument was that no one pursued it long enough to find out not that long enough equaled a life time.
Though i think that living up to the "labels" we're given is nonsence. You have to live up to your potential...no matter what other people say.
I doubt if that is true. IQ needn't be a fixed state. IQ changes due to circumstances (like stress or studies even suggest due to simple things like texting.. I know, strange). Often IQ Tests seem to have questions that can be answered by studying the type of questions lots, which doesn't necessarily need a profound type of intelligence. I'm pretty positive one can better ones IQ
*goes back to bed*