 |
Palin, Biden On Roe V. Wade
Uploaded by: CBS
Video Description:
Katie Couric sat down with Sarah Palin and Joe Biden and asked them their thoughts on Roe v. Wade.
Tags for this video: Biden Couric Joe Katie Palin Roe Sarah V. Wade
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by CBS
| 10/01 Palin Can't Name Supreme Court Case in Katie Couric Interview - Roe vs Wade Supreme Court Decision Sarah Palin Can't Name Supreme Court Decision Stumped by Katie in High Quality | Sen Fred Thompson Defends Palin's Supreme Court Answer 10/02 Vice Presidential Debate 2008 HQ Palin Biden Debate 2008 - Sarah Palin Joe Biden VP Debate Thursday October 2nd at Washington University in St Louis MO in HIGH QUALITY | Matt Damon Rips Sarah Palin |
 |  |  |
| Wash U. Palin, Biden Love Song | Palin On Foreign Policy | Biden, Palin On Dick Cheney |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
Most people don't know that science has reached the consensus that human life at conception. If everyone knew this fact abortion wouldn't be a social issue.
I would say abortion is more of an ethical issue then an emotional issue. Luckily, most people have the same ethics about human rights.
Slavery has been going on just as long. That doesn't make it right. Is Abortion old, yeah, but does that somehow make it right?
Murder is a pretty old crime.
Palin is not a legal scholar. Her background is in executive administration.
It's not likely Skatie Couric told either candidate her planned questions.
However, anyone who cannot spell "because" or "Supreme" IS A DUMB ASS!
who gives a shit about spelling. i hate people that bring that up it doest make a different. i mean u spelt cited as opposed to cite = wrong.
bidens background is in law. hes running (was running) for vice president. heavily involved in law. that makes it a good resume point so to speak.
palins background is redneck, no idea governer. so if she cant answer a question on law her background is not a good excuse for why she can't. the real excuse is that she has no clue
100% of america aren't christian.
why should laws be made to follow christian belefs. let alone extremist christians.
ever heard of the rule of law?
If someone have no conditions to take care of the child, and the child have to be given up for adoption, then the child would be better off than if he/she was not born in the first place? I don't see how letting a child suffer for 18 years is better than not letting he/she be born. If you are a child discarded at birth because your mother cannot have an abortion, how does that feel?
im talking about legislation
it doesnt matter whats in the case for waht im saying
You may also buy them from among the children of aliens among you, or from their families, whom they begot in your land. These shall become your property: you may keep them as a possession for your children, for them to inherit as property forever. Such you may treat as slaves. Lev 25:44
Yes, people shouldn't be killed because of what their parents have done. Hopefully we agree on this point.
Preemptive execution for people that SOME think might suffer is not justified. Hopefully we agree on this point.
Probably we disagree on whether unborn children are human beings. Fortunately this is not a matter of opinion and has a definite scientific answer, which is yes.
Throughtout history, A fetus has NEVER been considered a human of being. You are stupidly confusing the adjective "human" and the noun "human being," giving them the same meaning. Theyare definately different. YOu, amoung others, need ask Santa for a dictionary for Christmas.
Throughtout history, A fetus has NEVER been considered a person.Persons or human being...they both have rights...its why fetuses DON'T. Persons and human beings can vote. Guess thats why a fetus cant be called either one!
You're so silly human!! Abortion will always e legal.
You see that because you're smarter than a pro-lifer. They see a rice sized embryo as a 30 yr old soccor mon w/ 3 kids and an SUV. They live in a psychotic world of unreality. Keep up the good work!
You know why they do that, don't you? Its called an ad hominem argument. Is done when one can't fight the battle, & they go off on personal attacks(like spelling) to get your mind off of the fact that they don't have the ability to respond to your comments. Its an old psychological trick that never works. LoL
Right to whom? You? Are you the right & worng police? Are YOU the one who says what is right and/or wrong for EVERYone? Who the hell are you?
like how the little pastic bits on the end of laces are called aglets
Lair. There is so much history I could through at you, but to save time I'll just use one example. Its called pleading the belly. Many societies past and present that use/d the death penalty refused to execute a pregnant woman on the grounds that her child is innocent and shouldn't be executed for what their mother did.
Just because a government doesn't respect a group of people's rights doesn't mean they don't deserve rights.