 |
Fluxus - Wolf Vostell - Sun in your head
Uploaded by: luciomatema
Video Description:
Fluxus Films - 1963 - Wolf Vostell - Sun in your head - television decollage
Tags for this video: art decollage fluxus television vostell
Find more videos in the "Film" category
See more videos uploaded by luciomatema
| Fluxus Film: Zen For Film (Nam June Paik, 1962-1964) | Fluxus Performance | Back In Your Head - Tegan And Sara |
 |  |  |
| Wolf Vostell,E.d.H.R.1968,Complete Version,(4:31 Min) | Desert of the Real | Fluxus ·Fluxfilm 8· |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
| Comments for this video on YouTube |
| loved ( 2 years ago by livmassei) |
| loved |
| Wolf- I'm sorry but ... ( 2 years ago by dboyd) |
| Wolf- I'm sorry but this was not interesting enough for me to watch. It looks like many similar movies I watched at the Kenyon Fil Festival, circa 1968 or so. It also reminds me of PAIKS videos of about that time. I would be interested in hearing from you as to when it was made and what your main ideas were for it at the time. -Don Boyd |
| vostell made it a ... ( 1 year ago by sjh343) |
| vostell made it a very long time ago and was Paiks inspiration to start using video in his art and they were good friends. vostell was the first video artist, predating paik and others. |
| vostell it´s most ... ( 1 year ago by teonasno) |
| vostell it´s most primitive than paik. No is the first, they are only ones. |
| I do love fluxus, ... ( 1 year ago by blueseagull) |
| I do love fluxus, but I think I prefer the Dada manifesto ;D |
| Array ( 1 year ago by PyePye7) |
| Wolf's long dead & got other fish to fry. Vid Art was a new media in the 60's and +-provocative to the eyes/minds back then. Today, the synapses are conditioned according to now. Certain Art Statements (of the 60's) are to be quite likely irrelevant today. Did their job back then and to be switched off afterwards (except for the museums). Expectations that things have to last forever are illusionary, look at good food! Wolf obviously lived for the Now, a modest & sympathetic gesture. |
| I agree with you. ... ( 1 year ago by aurileide) |
| I agree with you. Wolf´s research about the "new media" of his time was so important to nowadays art movements that it is simply impossible to think about it without considering the movement ot video and computer art. He was a brilliant artist. Pity not everybody understand his meaning. But I was glad to hear that you do. |
| Is this a ... ( 1 year ago by PyePye7) |
| Is this a translation machine? |
| why cannot this ... ( 1 year ago by popeseyes) |
| why cannot this work be re-entered at anytime.. my synapses still snap to Rembrandt etc and are not set to any o'clock |
| Of course, can be ... ( 1 year ago by PyePye7) |
| Of course, can be re-entered anytime - agree. To add >the resulting impact of an art statement is first related to the Zeitgeist at which point it was created. It may then be perceived:In phase (time-wise), out of phase (as with many old Masters) or in-phase again later resonance-wise. Some things come back again & again, may even take on a new meaning etc... |
| Vostell reverts to ... ( 1 year ago by PyePye7) |
| Vostell reverts to the effect of early TV transmission test pictures from the 30's where electronic synchronisation was a major task. Later, technological progress presented the brains smoother imagery which made it easier to find sense/interpretation'. This video shows imagery with large holes in-between, the brain has to work harder allowing it more space for all sorts of interpretations which would usually work against the interest of the manipulators >TV stations and groups behind. |
| uzuri's mother ( 6 months ago by gecekusu36) |
| uzuri's mother |
| great! ( 5 months ago by earthlydelights2006) |
| great! |
Tell a friend: