![]() |
How the eye evolved - National Geo
Uploaded by: hellgas0
Video Description:
When evolution skeptics want to attack Darwin's theory, they often point to the human eye. How could something so complex, they argue, have developed through random mutations and natural selection, even over millions of years?
If evolution occurs through gradations, the critics say, how could it have created the separate parts of the eye -- the lens, the retina, the pupil, and so forth -- since none of these structures by themselves would make vision possible? In other words, what good is five percent of an eye?
Darwin acknowledged from the start that the eye would be a difficult case for his new theory to explain. Difficult, but not impossible. Scientists have come up with scenarios through which the first eye-like structure, a light-sensitive pigmented spot on the skin, could have gone through changes and complexities to form the human eye, with its many parts and astounding abilities.
Through natural selection, different types of eyes have emerged in evolutionary history -- and the human eye isn't even the best one, from some standpoints. Because blood vessels run across the surface of the retina instead of beneath it, it's easy for the vessels to proliferate or leak and impair vision. So, the evolution theorists say, the anti-evolution argument that life was created by an "intelligent designer" doesn't hold water: If God or some other omnipotent force was responsible for the human eye, it was something of a botched design.
Tags for this video: atheist charles complex complexity creation darwin design evolution eye intelligent irreducible theist
Find more videos in the "Education" category
See more videos uploaded by hellgas0
| Human Eye Function | Evolution of the Eye | The Human Eye is NOT Irreductibly Complex |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Mutations | The evolution of eyes | Evolution of the Eye |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:

















believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be
considered as subversive of the theory. (quote continued #2)
Please don't quote mine.